返回全部动态

两年大学研究:课堂禁用 AI 反而让学生表现更差

原标题:Two-year university study finds banning AI from classrooms leaves students worse off

THE DECODER研究质量 66

AI 摘要

阿姆斯特丹自由大学法学教授 Thibault Schrepel 在其「AI 法律」课程中开展了为期两年的实验,将学生随机分为禁用 ChatGPT、无指导使用 AI、接受结构化提示工程训练三组。结果显示,禁用 AI 的组两年均排名最后,而接受训练的组在 2024 年优势明显,但到 2025 年因学生普遍熟悉聊天机器人而几乎消失。Schrepel 因此推翻了自己原先认为 AI 仅在有指导时才有益的假设,并建议大学不要全面禁止 AI,而应重新思考硕士论文等考核方式。

以上摘要由 AI 生成,可能存在误差。事实请以原文为准。

正文节选

Two-year university study finds banning AI from classrooms leaves students worse off A law professor spent two years testing how an AI ban, unguided AI suggestions, and structured training affect student performance. The group without AI finished last both years. "I was wrong," the researcher writes. He had assumed AI without guidance would do more harm than good. Thibault Schrepel of Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam randomly split students in his "Law of AI" course into three groups. The task was t


发布时间:2026-09-13 17:27
抓取时间:2026-09-13 18:20
来源机构:THE DECODER
阅读原文the-decoder.com