Claude Code 团队：代码审查应持续进行而非末尾关卡
原标题：Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang
AI 摘要
Addy Osmani、Morgan Westlee Lunt 和 Qing Wang 在《How the Claude Code team does code review》中提出，用「人类是否读过代码」来判断风险并不准确，应改为关注「这次改动可能出什么问题、哪种检查（自动或人工）最合适」。他们指出，代码审查因此从 PR 末尾的关卡变成持续进行的过程，多数改动在人工查看前已由 Claude 至少审查并修复过一次，从而节省团队注意力用于更高层次的问题。
正文节选
16th October 2026 We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?" Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague. Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is ask