返回全部动态

等预算下MCTS与随机重启列表调度对比:受控计算研究

原标题:Equal-Budget Monte Carlo Tree Search versus Randomized-Restart List Scheduling for DAG Workflows: A Controlled Equal-Budget Computational Study

arXiv cs.AI一手来源研究质量 75

AI 摘要

该研究在受控合成域中对MCTS与随机重启列表调度进行等预算比较,所有方法获得相同数量的候选调度评估。在2048次评估的主预算下,MCTS比随机重启差2.88%,且700/720的MCTS首次结果仅为其热启动。将选择规则换为教科书式UCT后差距大部分消失但未反转,结果限于小规模合成任务,未声称更大预算下的结论。

以上摘要由 AI 生成,可能存在误差。事实请以原文为准。

正文节选

Equal-Budget Monte Carlo Tree Search versus Randomized-Restart List Scheduling for DAG Workflows: A Controlled Equal-Budget Computational Study Abstract Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) is often proposed for scheduling directed-acyclic-graph (DAG) workflows, yet most studies never run the comparison that could refute it—giving a much simpler method the same search effort. We run that comparison under a controlled protocol. All arms receive an identical budget—the same number of candidate schedules


发布时间:2026-10-12 12:00
抓取时间:2026-10-12 12:03
来源机构:arXiv
阅读原文arxiv.org